SaaS valuation multiples by stage
The numbers below come from 271 closed SaaS transactions, grouped by revenue bracket and by the basis the price was set on. They are the same rows the valuation calculator uses, rendered from its code. Last engine update 2026-10-29.
The short answer
A financial buyer prices a SaaS company on a multiple of revenue, earnings (EBITDA), or owner earnings (SDE). Which basis applies depends on size and profitability: founder-run companies under about $5M ARR trade on SDE, steadily profitable companies on EBITDA, and loss-making companies on revenue. Where a company lands inside its bracket depends on retention, growth, margin, and how the business runs without the founder.
| ARR bracket | Median revenue multiple | Median EBITDA multiple | Median SDE multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0 to $2M | 1.80x | 6.29x | 3.02x |
| $2M to $5M | 2.18x | 6.72x | 4.50x |
| $5M to $20M | 2.45x | 10.68x | not enough deals |
| $20M to $50M | 3.80x | 18.20x | not enough deals |
The full table
Quartiles per bracket and basis. Rows under $20M use only targets that made money at sale, because loss-making targets were priced by venture and strategic buyers on factors a calculator cannot see. The $20M to $50M rows have not been re-filtered yet and are marked.
| Bracket | Basis | 25th | Median | 75th | Deals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0 to $2M | Revenue | 1.31x | 1.80x | 2.91x | 42 |
| $0 to $2M | EBITDA | 3.49x | 6.29x | 13.00x | 20 |
| $0 to $2M | SDE | 2.28x | 3.02x | 4.14x | 28 |
| $2M to $5M | Revenue | 1.57x | 2.18x | 3.84x | 33 |
| $2M to $5M | EBITDA | 4.98x | 6.72x | 13.89x | 21 |
| $2M to $5M | SDE | 3.82x | 4.50x | 6.13x | 12 |
| $5M to $20M | Revenue | 1.52x | 2.45x | 4.10x | 31 |
| $5M to $20M | EBITDA | 7.89x | 10.68x | 18.60x | 17 |
| $20M to $50M | Revenue | 2.50x | 3.80x | 7.50x | 45 (unverified) |
| $20M to $50M | EBITDA | 10.50x | 18.20x | 30.10x | 22 (unverified) |
Source: BVR DealStats, NAICS 513210, sale dates 2015-01 to 2025-01.
Why the top of the EBITDA range is not the base case
Each EBITDA bracket holds 17 to 22 profitable deals. The 75th percentile of 20 deals rests on 5 of them, and in a SaaS deal set those 5 are strategic sales: a buyer paid for a customer list, a team or a product line, not for the earnings. A general estimate should not quote the strategic outcome as the base case. The calculator therefore ends the EBITDA curve at the 60th percentile under $5M ARR and the 65th above it. Exceptional SaaS businesses do sell for exceptional multiples; those prices are set in a negotiation, not by a benchmark.
| Bracket | Deals | Median | 75th | Ceiling under $5M ARR | Ceiling at $5M and up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0 to $2M | 20 | 6.29x | 13.00x | 8.41x | 9.72x |
| $2M to $5M | 21 | 6.72x | 13.89x | 8.98x | 10.39x |
| $5M to $20M | 17 | 10.68x | 18.60x | 13.33x | 14.90x |
| $20M to $50M | 22 | 18.20x | 30.10x | 22.26x | 24.61x |
What buyers look at first, by stage
The stages and their concerns come from the SaaS Sellability Checklist in Livmo's open exit-engineering repository.
Twelve worked valuations
Twelve example companies run through the calculator. Each shows the stage, the score, the basis, the multiple after any cap, and the estimate. Load any of them in the calculator to see every input.
Pocket Ledger
$280K ARR · stage 1 · 10 of 35 inputs answeredFintech · bookkeeping for freelancers
A two-year-old bookkeeping app for freelancers and one-person agencies, built and run by one founder. Revenue is $280K and grew 60% last year off a small base, mostly through app-store search and a few popular tutorials. The founder writes the code, answers support, and keeps the books on a cash basis in a spreadsheet. Billing runs through an app store, so churn and retention have never been measured. A buyer would see a product with real traction and no evidence about who stays.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %Not measured. Subscriptions run through an app store and the founder has never pulled a cohort report, so retention is unknown rather than bad.
- 2Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Not measured for the same reason. One plan, one price, no expansion to count.
- 3LTV:CAC RatioUnknown. Acquisition is organic, so there is no spend to divide by.
What carries it
- ARR Growth Rate (YoY)Excellent, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
- Recurring Revenue %Excellent, full marks.
Priced on owner earnings (SDE): 2.22x on $14K. No cap applies.
Lumen AI
$150K ARR · stage 1 · 8 of 35 inputs answeredAI tooling · meeting notes and summaries
A one-year-old AI meeting-notes tool on usage pricing. Revenue is $150K and grew 250% from almost nothing, driven by a launch on a product community and word of mouth among startup teams. Every dollar of revenue costs $1.60 to serve and acquire, so the company burns 60% of revenue and runs on a small seed round. The founders track growth and little else. The product is strong and the market is crowded; nothing yet shows whether customers stay once the novelty wears off.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %Not tracked. Usage billing makes churn hard to see and the team has not built the report.
- 2Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Not tracked.
- 3LTV:CAC RatioUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
What carries it
- ARR Growth Rate (YoY)Excellent, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
- Technology PlatformExcellent, full marks.
Priced on revenue: 1.14x on $150K. No cap applies.
Bramble Dental
$1.4M ARR · stage 2 · 36 of 36 inputs answeredVertical SaaS · dental practice recall and scheduling
A six-year-old bootstrapped tool that runs patient recall, reminders and online booking for independent dental practices. Revenue is $1.4M, growing 28% a year with a 22% EBITDA margin. Practices rarely leave once the front desk depends on it, so gross retention is 93%. The founder has a second closer and an office manager who runs onboarding, so the business survives a month without them. Books are accrual, closed monthly, reviewed by a CPA. Expansion is limited because most customers are single-location practices with nothing more to buy.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %93%. Practices leave when they sell or retire, almost never for a competitor.
- 2Expansion ARR %Low by design. Single-location practices have no second seat to add. Expansion comes from a new add-on, not from growth inside the account.
- 3ARR Growth Rate (YoY)28%. Sales-led into a finite market of practices, one at a time. Solid, under the 40% top tier.
What carries it
- Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Proven, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
- Recurring Revenue %Excellent, full marks.
Priced on earnings (EBITDA), blended with revenue because the margin sits between 0 and 25 percent: 8.59x on $308K. No cap applies.
Beacon Social
$2.2M ARR · stage 3 · 25 of 36 inputs answeredMarketing tech · social media scheduling for small businesses
A three-year-old social scheduling and analytics tool sold to small businesses on monthly plans, with hybrid usage pricing for larger accounts. Revenue is $2.2M and doubled last year, almost all of it from paid search and affiliate channels. The problem is the other side of the funnel: gross revenue retention is 40%, so six in ten dollars leave within a year. Small businesses sign up for a campaign, a season or a launch and cancel when it ends, and the product has little that locks them in, because competitors offer the same scheduling features at the same price. Gross margin is 55% because of social-platform API fees and support load. The company breaks even, the founder has a capable number two but still owns sales, and the books are clean. It looks like a rocket from the growth number and a leaky bucket from the retention number, and buyers price the bucket.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %40%. Small-business marketing tools churn when the campaign ends. Monthly plans make leaving a one-click decision, and competitors match the feature set, so there is no switching cost.
- 2Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %40%. No expansion to offset the churn; most customers are on the smallest plan and stay there.
- 3Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Zero. Never profitable, by choice, to keep the growth number up.
What carries it
- ARR Growth Rate (YoY)100%. Paid search and affiliates fill the top of the funnel every month. The growth is real, but it is bought, and it replaces customers who left.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)100 minus 0 is 100, so it scores top marks, and that is the flaw in the Rule of 40 for a company that buys growth with churn.
- Recurring Revenue %Excellent, full marks.
Priced on revenue: 1.00x on $2.2M. Gross revenue retention under 70% caps the multiple at 1.00x.
Harbor Studio
$900K ARR · stage 2 · 16 of 36 inputs answeredAgency turned product · client portal for creative studios
An eight-year-old design agency that built a client-portal product for its own studio and started selling it to other studios. Revenue is $900K, but only 60% of it recurs; the rest is project work the founder still sells and delivers. Margins are healthy at 18% and the company has been profitable for three years. The founder closes every deal, and the client contracts are the agency's old service agreements, which do not transfer on a sale. Books are cash basis. A buyer sees a profitable business that is still half an agency and that cannot run, or be sold, without the founder.
What holds the number down
- 1LTV:CAC RatioUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
- 2Product DifferentiationUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
- 3Technology PlatformUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
What carries it
- Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Proven, full marks.
- Company AgeMature, full marks.
- Financial readinessAt or above the rung buyers expect at this stage.
Priced on owner earnings (SDE): 2.38x on $162K. No cap applies.
Northwind Logistics
$3.5M ARR · stage 3 · 35 of 36 inputs answeredVertical SaaS · warehouse and freight operations
A seven-year-old operations platform for mid-size third-party logistics warehouses: receiving, slotting, carrier booking and billing. Revenue is $3.5M, growing 35% with a 15% EBITDA margin, 90% gross retention and 1.5% monthly logo churn. The numbers are those of a well-run company. The operations are a step behind them. The founder still runs sales personally, there is no general manager, SOPs were never written, and security stops at MFA and backups with no written policy and no penetration test. Customer contracts are mostly annual. A buyer would like the business and price in the cost of building the management layer.
What holds the number down
- 1Management depthA second person closes deals, but the founder owns the pipeline. Stage 3 buyers expect a sales lead who owns it, and a plan to keep key staff.
- 2Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %90%. Warehouses rarely switch systems mid-contract.
- 3Expansion ARR %Average, 2 of 4 points. Next tier Good at 20% or more.
What carries it
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
- Company AgeMature, full marks.
- Financial readinessAt or above the rung buyers expect at this stage.
Priced on earnings (EBITDA), blended with revenue because the margin sits between 0 and 25 percent: 12.43x on $525K. No cap applies.
Quillon Compliance
$4.2M ARR · stage 3 · 36 of 36 inputs answeredRegtech · compliance workflow for fintech companies
An eight-year-old compliance workflow platform for fintech companies: policy management, evidence collection and audit trails. Revenue is $4.2M, growing 40% with a 24% EBITDA margin, 94% gross retention and 112% net retention. Every operations ladder is at or above what stage 3 buyers expect: a leadership team, SOC 2, monthly close, a sales lead who owns the pipeline. One problem: an open lawsuit from a former reseller over commissions. Nothing else is wrong, and that one item caps the price, because a buyer treats any open claim as money held back at closing.
What holds the number down
- 1No open litigation, claims, or regulatory issuesA former reseller is suing over unpaid commissions. The amount is small against the company's value, but an open claim becomes an escrow at close and a buyer caps the multiple until it is resolved.
- 2Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %94%, one point under the 95% top tier. Fintech customers rarely leave a compliance system their auditors know.
- 3LTV:CAC Ratio4.5. Efficient, under the 5.0 top tier because enterprise sales cycles are long.
What carries it
- ARR Growth Rate (YoY)Excellent, full marks.
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Excellent, full marks.
- Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Proven, full marks.
Priced on earnings (EBITDA), blended with revenue because the margin sits between 0 and 25 percent: 5.04x on $1.0M. No open litigation, claims, or regulatory issues caps the multiple at 4.98x.
Skyward Robotics
$8.0M ARR · stage 4 · 27 of 36 inputs answeredIndustrial software · fleet management for warehouse robots
A four-year-old, venture-backed cloud platform that manages fleets of warehouse robots: routing, monitoring and maintenance. Revenue is $8M, growing 80% a year with 118% net retention, because customers who deploy keep adding robots. The company burns 20% of revenue on a large engineering team. Gross retention is 88%: a share of customers run a pilot, never reach production, and cancel. The ladders sit at stage 3 levels while the company is now stage 4; the leadership team is forming and the books are monthly but not yet audited. A buyer prices this on revenue, and the pilot churn costs about 30% of the multiple.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %88%. Pilots that never reach production churn out. Customers that deploy stay and expand, which is why net retention is 118% at the same time.
- 2Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Never profitable, by design at this stage.
- 3LTV:CAC Ratio2.8. Long enterprise sales cycles and pilots that do not convert push acquisition cost up.
What carries it
- ARR Growth Rate (YoY)Excellent, full marks.
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Excellent, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
Priced on revenue: 3.17x on $8.0M. Gross revenue retention 80 to 89% caps the multiple at 3.17x.
Meridian Payroll
$12.0M ARR · stage 4 · 36 of 36 inputs answeredHR tech · payroll and benefits for mid-market employers
A nine-year-old payroll and benefits platform for companies with 100 to 2,000 employees. Revenue is $12M, growing 30% with a 25% EBITDA margin and five consecutive profitable years. Payroll is the stickiest software a company owns, so gross retention is 94%, logo churn is 0.8% a month, and 75% of revenue sits on annual contracts. The company has a full leadership team, audited financials, SOC 2 Type II and a documented operating system. Nothing holds it back except growth at 30% rather than 40%, which is what a mature category allows.
What holds the number down
- 1Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %94%. Employers almost never switch payroll mid-year.
- 2Expansion ARR %18%. Benefits add-ons drive expansion; headcount growth at customers drives the rest.
- 3ARR Growth Rate (YoY)30%. Payroll is a mature category; 30% is strong for it and under the 40% top tier.
What carries it
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Excellent, full marks.
- Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Proven, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
Priced on earnings (EBITDA): 14.90x on $3.0M. No cap applies.
Tidewater Scheduling
$650K ARR · stage 2 · 15 of 36 inputs answeredVertical SaaS · scheduling for marinas and boat service yards
An eleven-year-old scheduling and work-order tool for marinas and boat service yards, built by a former yard manager who still runs it alone. Revenue is $650K at a 40% EBITDA margin, profitable for six years, 100% recurring, 86% gross retention. Growth is 10% a year and the three-year CAGR is 8%, because the founder does no marketing and the market is finite. There is no second person, no written process, and the books are cash basis. A classic lifestyle business: the founder is the product, the support desk and the sales team, and buyers price it as owner earnings times a small multiple.
What holds the number down
- 1LTV:CAC RatioUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
- 2Product DifferentiationUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
- 3Technology PlatformUnanswered. 12 points at stake.
What carries it
- Consecutive years profitable (EBITDA above 0)Proven, full marks.
- Rule of 40 (Calculated)Excellent, full marks.
- Company AgeMature, full marks.
Priced on owner earnings (SDE): 2.47x on $260K. No cap applies.
Ridgeline Field Service
$1.8M ARR · stage 2 · 34 of 36 inputs answeredVertical SaaS · field service for HVAC contractors
A seven-year-old dispatch, quoting and invoicing tool for HVAC and plumbing contractors. Revenue is $1.8M with a 12% EBITDA margin. The operations are in order: accrual books, a sales lead, SOPs, a customer success owner, clean legal. The problem is the top line. A distribution partner that resold the product to its contractor network ended the agreement last year, and revenue fell 5%. Three-year growth is 4%. Gross retention is 82%: contractors churn when they go out of business, which in a trade with thin margins happens often. The down year is a stated deal-breaker at stage 2, and it caps the price however good the operations are.
What holds the number down
- 1No flat or down year in the last 3Revenue fell 5% last year when a distribution partner ended its reseller agreement. At stages 1 to 3 the checklist treats a flat or down year as a deal-breaker, whatever else is true.
- 2ARR Growth Rate (YoY)Minus 5%. The lost partner channel was about a fifth of new bookings.
- 3Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %82%. Contractors who go out of business take their subscription with them. The product is not the reason they leave, but the revenue is gone either way.
What carries it
- Company AgeMature, full marks.
- Financial readinessAt or above the rung buyers expect at this stage.
- Management depthAt or above the rung buyers expect at this stage.
Priced on revenue, blended with revenue because the margin sits between 0 and 25 percent: 0.72x on $1.8M. No flat or down year in the last 3 caps the multiple at 1.00x.
Atlas Procurement
$30.0M ARR · stage 5 · 36 of 36 inputs answeredEnterprise SaaS · procurement and spend management
A twelve-year-old procurement suite for companies with revenue between $200M and $5B: sourcing, contracts, purchase orders and supplier management. Revenue is $30M, growing 24% with a 20% EBITDA margin and six profitable years. Gross retention is 95%, net retention 115%, logo churn 0.5% a month, and 85% of revenue is on annual or multi-year contracts. Audited financials, a complete leadership team, SOC 2, a documented operating system and a competitor map with win rates. The only thing that costs points is growth at 24%, normal for an enterprise suite at this size. This is the company the ceiling exists for: the estimate sits at the 65th percentile of its bracket, and a strategic buyer might pay more.
What holds the number down
- 1ARR Growth Rate (YoY)24%. Enterprise sales cycles of six to twelve months cap how fast a $30M company can grow organically.
- 2Expansion ARR %22%. Modules and seats grow with each customer; the top tier starts at 25%.
- 3Delivery ModelImplementation projects accompany most sales. Good, not pure self-serve software.
What carries it
- Gross Revenue Retention (GRR) - Annual %Excellent, full marks.
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) - Annual %Excellent, full marks.
- LTV:CAC RatioExceptional, full marks.
Priced on earnings (EBITDA), blended with revenue because the margin sits between 0 and 25 percent: 25.40x on $6.0M. No cap applies.
Run your own numbers
The calculator asks 36 inputs and 6 deal-breaker questions and places your company on these curves. Every rule, weight and table is on the Logic page, rendered from the code that computes the number.